Child Second Language Acquisition

Running head : CHILD L2 ACQUISITIONChild stake speech Acquisitionand its Similarities toAdult station Language AcquisitionDoes sister flash vocabulary (cL2 ) achievement mark off adult turn lyric (aL2 ) attainment or does it theatrical role common properties with first language (L1 ) eruditeness ? This is a question that Meisel (2004 ) has tried to clarify in his (p . 55 ) and this is the question this subdue on would attempt to answerBased on the existing body of books on second language acquirement , this sets forth the suggestion : Second language (L2 acquisition of children is more comparable to second language (L2 acquisition of adults than to first language (L1 ) acquisition . gum olibanum , the equalities of child L2 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition will be presented , discussed and examined beneat h . These similarities , which are taken from the findings of research studies conducted by lingual researchers such as Meisel (2004 , Marinis (2007 , Guasti (2004 ) among others , are group into four categoriesFirst , cL2 acquisition is similar to aL2 acquisition in the area of grammatical culture curiously in the domain of morphology and syntax . This bureau that second language acquisition of children is similar to second language acquisition of adults in terms of the forms and positions of verbs personad in sentences . This point is declare by the results in Pienemann (1981 , cited in Meisel , 2004 . Meisel (2004 presented specific grammatical features that assume this through the results of a cross-sectional study involving 14 children with ages 5 to 7 years old who were bilingual German- French learners and monolingual French learners (p . 60 ) and a quasi-longitudinal study involving 35 children who were group according to the length of their exposure to French (p .64 . The findings of the studies showed tha! t (a L2 children are akin L2 adults who bulge bounded verbs in the correct position . That is , L2 children phthisis finite verb forms where it is required (p .

61- 62 (b ) Second language children trust the French non-clitic faces in preverbal position adjacent to the verb just entreat well what L2 adults do (p . 67 (c ) Child L2 learners liquefy heller finite verbs as well as a subject clitic with countless verb forms which adult L2 learners also exhibit (p . 67 (d ) L2 children combine two finite verbs rather than combining finite elements with unnumbered thematic verbs which is similar to L2 adults behavior (p . 69 (e ) Second Language children prove the same behavior of combining subject clitics with innumerous verb forms as that of second language adults (p 69 (f ) Child L2 learners move into the negator non before the verb to be negated like adult L2 learners do (p . 71However , it is fuel to none that in the light of this similarity of cL2 and aL2 in the acquisition of the morphological and syntactical domain , some researchers do not agree in their findings with the results of the studies of other researchers . For one , the conclusions of Meisel (2004 ) state that it is scarce in the morphological domain that child L2 is like aL2 (p...If you collect to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay